<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>publication on Dr. Erin Buchanan</title>
    <link>https://doomlab.github.io/tags/publication/</link>
    <description>Recent content in publication on Dr. Erin Buchanan</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://doomlab.github.io/tags/publication/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Big Team Science Lessons Learned</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/2026-06-11-big-team-science-lessons-learned/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/2026-06-11-big-team-science-lessons-learned/</guid>
      <description>Big Team Science Is More Than Bigger Samples: Lessons from Cognitive Science Psychological science has spent the last decade grappling with questions of credibility, reproducibility, and generalizability. One of the most important responses to these challenges has been the rise of Big Team Science (BTS)&amp;mdash;large-scale collaborative projects that bring together researchers across institutions, countries, languages, and disciplines. A new paper published in Collabra: Psychology, The Advantage of Big Team Science: Lessons Learned from Cognitive Science, reflects on what we&amp;rsquo;ve learned from organizing and participating in these massive collaborations and offers practical guidance for future projects.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Year of the Thesis</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/2019-in-review/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/2019-in-review/</guid>
      <description>The Year of the Thesis!
Just wanted to highlight several publications from this year, which were mostly theses from some fabulous young researchers:
Scofield, J.E., Kostic, B., &amp;amp; Buchanan, E.M. (2019). How the presence of others affects desirability judgments in heterosexual and homosexual participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, X, XX–XX. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01516-w
Maxwell, N.P. &amp;amp; Buchanan, E.M. (2019). Investigating the interaction of direct and indirect relation on memory judgments and retrieval.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publications</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publications-oct-19/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publications-oct-19/</guid>
      <description>Just updated my CV - here&amp;rsquo;s a few new publications and conferences! The weird thing about the automatic CV updater I wrote is that you can&amp;rsquo;t really predict what order the same year publications are going to be in - not that it matters in general, but it&amp;rsquo;s an interesting side effect.
Also, super proud - both of these are student theses turned papers:
Maxwell, N.P. &amp;amp; Buchanan, E.M. (2019).Investigating the interaction of direct and in-direct relation on memory judgments and retrieval.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publications and Updated CV</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publications-and-updated-cv/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publications-and-updated-cv/</guid>
      <description>Hi guys! I just wanted to post that I&amp;rsquo;ve updated the website to be current with some new publications I wanted to highlight:
First up is two papers on psycholinguistics that were undergraduate student projects:
Duncan, J., Buchanan, E.M., Marshall, C.Z., &amp;amp; Oberdieck, K. (accepted). But words will never hurt me, Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, X, XX-XX. PDF
Forbes, F.-J., &amp;amp; Buchanan, E. M. (accepted). “Textisms”: The Comfort of the Recipient, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, X, XX-XX.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Current Publications with Papaja</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/current-publications-with-papaja/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/current-publications-with-papaja/</guid>
      <description>Heyo! Frederik, the author of papaja, requested that we update him with papers written with his package. I was like, oh man, like the whole lab?! So, I decided that I could probably make it easy by making a table here. Obviously, this table is current at the moment, as I hope many of the ones under review will get accepted, and I have several others that we will start writing soon.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publication: Texting</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publication-texting/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publication-texting/</guid>
      <description>One more announcement! We just had a new publication accepted:
&amp;ldquo;Textisms&amp;rdquo;: The Comfort of the Recipient: This paper was an undergraduate honors thesis that Flora-Jean and I finally got accepted! She did a great job making sure this paper was completed and published.
You can check out the materials here: https://osf.io/8kt52/
You can view the pre-print: https://osf.io/ptf7c/
We should have the real print up soon! Just waiting on the journal now.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publications</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publications/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publications/</guid>
      <description>Just wanted to do a quick post to say that the Nature Human Behavior response paper, Justify Your Alpha is now online at NHB&amp;rsquo;s website: Springer - it is free to view but not download. You can download the PDF version on OSF.
We&amp;rsquo;ve submitted a couple new papers as well - updated those on my research publications page. I also have a couple more to get done - hoping to feature some of the cool coding work I&amp;rsquo;ve done this week after taking a breather from a seriously packed week.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Publication - Detect Low Quality Data</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publication-detect-low-quality-data/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/new-publication-detect-low-quality-data/</guid>
      <description>My coauthor John Scofield and I just had a publication accepted at Behavior Research Methods - you can check out the publication preprint at OSF.
We thew together a website for the paper that summarizes everything we found, as well as puts all the materials together in one place - check it out.
We create a really nice R function to help you detect low quality data, which you can find on GitHub, and I even made a video that explains all the parts to the function at YouTube.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Citations in R Markdown &#43; Papaja</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/citations-in-r-markdown-papaja/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/citations-in-r-markdown-papaja/</guid>
      <description>Heyo! I wanted to write a post about some of the quirky things I&amp;rsquo;ve found with writing manuscripts in R Markdown, as well as provide a solution to a problem that someone else might be having.
Update: The csl file I describe below is a special formatted one, which was shared with me. You can download it from GitHub to try the suggestions below.
Update 2: Turns out, potentially, the suggestions from the manual are not working correctly, as Frederik has checked it out and opened an issue on github.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Shiny App to Compare Stats</title>
      <link>https://doomlab.github.io/post/a-shiny-app-to-compare-stats/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://doomlab.github.io/post/a-shiny-app-to-compare-stats/</guid>
      <description>For a recent publication comparing null hypothesis testing p-values to Bayes Factors and Observation Oriented Modeling, we created a Shiny app to graph all of our complex plots. I particularly pleased with the plotly 3D graph - as I usually think that 3D graphs are impossible to read. This plot shows what we found in our study (albeit I would recommend viewing the 2D plots more):
Bayes Factors and p-values follow a power function, as we expected.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
